Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Antionomianism, some scriptural antecedents

“Antinomian” is a term used to characterize a general belief that grace has set Christians above any obligations to obey moral laws. Etymologically, “Antinomian” means “against the law.” Antinomianism is the belief that the Gospel represents a new Covenant that abrogates Mosaic law. Conventional—I am tempted to say “authoritative”—sources for antinomian belief include Paul, Augustine, Luther, and Calvin.

According to Paul:

While we were living in the flesh, our sinful passions, aroused by the law, were at work in our members to bear fruit for death. But now we are discharged by the law, dead to that which held us captive, so that we serve not under the old written code but in the new life of the spirit. (Romans 7: 5-6) 

For we hold that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law. A man is justified by faith, without the deeds of the law. (Romans 3:28)

I was once alive apart from the law, but when the commandment came, sin revived and I died…. (Romans 7:9)

. . . I see in my members another law at war with the law in my mind and making me captive to the law of sin….  (Romans 7:22)

But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God. All things are lawful unto me . . . (1.Corinthians 6:11-12)

 . . . a man is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ . . . by works of the law shall no one be justified. (Galatians 2:16).

For I through the law died to the law, that I might live to God. (Galatians 2:19)

Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us . . . (Galatians 3:13)

. . . God, who saved us and called us with a holy calling, not in virtue of our works but in virtue of his own purpose and the grace which he gave us in Christ Jesus ages ago.... (2.Tim 1:8-9) 


Collectively, these and similar passages in scripture produced remarkably liberalizing effects in the minds of Protestants who, studying translations in their native tongues, read and interpreted these passages as they saw fit.  As orthodox Protestant teaching emphasized a direct hermeneutic experience unencumbered by priestly intercession, even the counsel of informed interpreters was powerless to mitigate the anarchic conclusions that such passages clearly foster. 

The above is taken  from "'A' is for Antinomian: Theology and Politics in The Scarlet  Letter, my Afterword to the International Authors edition of Nathaniel Hawthorne's esteemed novel.  Please click the cover image to view the Amazon sales page:

 

Lucas Cranach the Elder, Allegory of Law and Grace (1530)

Thursday, February 18, 2021

Writing Paragraphs on Philosophical Terms and Philosophers


Philosophical Terms


Topic Sentence: identify the term in a general statement. 

 

Supporting Sentences: specific statements in which you describe, explain, discuss and comment on the term. Develop general points with discussion, illustrations and examples.  Suggested descriptive points: 

 

Definition 

Origin and history of the term/the use of the term 

Explain the term
Examples and illustrations of problems and questions surrounding or falling under the heading of the term 

What other people have said about the term 

What you think about the term, your views 

Significance? 

 

 

Philosophers, Theologians and Figures of Philosophical Interest 

 

Topic Sentence: identify the figure in a general statement. What is the figure’s significance or place in the history of ideas? 

 

Supporting Sentences: specific statements in which you describe, explain, discuss and comment on the figure. Develop general points with discussion, illustrations and examples.  Suggested descriptive points: 

 

Significance (possibly continued from your topic sentence, or make this(these) remark(s) at the end of your paragraph) 

Biography 

Publications and work 

Figure influenced by_______________ 

Figure influenced_______________ 

(Remember, influences—in either direction—can include other figures, history, politics, the history of philosophy, biographical matters, and the world of schools and school teachers.) 

Main ideas (What are the figures most important ideas?  Also, possibly use the “Moral Philosophy in Context” tool: 1) Metaphysical beliefs, special claims for reason or logic, theory of human nature. 2) Moral Philosophy. 3) Political Philosophy.) 

What other people have said about the figure (you might want to return to significance) 

What you think about the figure, your views (again, you might want to return to significance) 

Possible final statement: Why is the figure significant? 


Albrecht Dürer, Melencolia I

Friday, February 12, 2021

Saturday, February 6, 2021

Keeping a Record

Horace Vernet, Jeremiah on the ruins of Jerusalem (1844)

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

A Philosophy of Spontaneous "Systems" Organization

I am currently reading Apollo 13 Owners' Workshop Manual: An engineering insight into how NASA saved the crew of the failed Moon mission by David Baker. The author goes into amazing detail describing the technology and the processes by which the Apollo 13 mission--crew, mission control, engineers--transitioned from a moon landing mission to an ad hoc rescue effort. Although there were contingency plans for technical failures that might occur at virtually every stage of the flight, the particular emergency Apollo 13 faced was not anticipated; the extraordinary conditions were met with an extraordinary response. At one level, the book provides amazing descriptions of Apollo technology, at another, the book describes an extensive and flexible institutional "apparatus" comprising thousands of engineers, managers, and technicians in NASA, industry, the military, and government. 

Compare, in a sense, Xenophon's descriptions in The Persian Wars of the 10,000 suddenly (and very cleverly) re-organizing after the murder of the Greek generals, and so on.


Tuesday, February 2, 2021

Plato and Aristotle, Two Key Distinctions

1 Theory of Forms                                                       

Plato: Everything in this world is a mere imitation of an ideal form that really exists in Eternity.                                                        

Aristotle: Form is a component of matter.                    

2 Eudemonia

Plato: We should seek eudemonia in the next life, in Eternity. This life and certainly this world impede our search for eudemonia.

Aristotle: We should seek eudemonia in this life as well as the next.

Raphael, The School of Athens (1511, detail)