![]() |
| John Schoenherr, 1962 |
![]() |
| One of the structures of Casa Sperimentale near Rome, photo Oliver Astrologo |
We shall begin our consideration of the law in a week or so. To get the most out of that analysis, please review the following Highbrow posts:
The Declaration of Independence
Philosophical Remarks on the Declaration of Independence: Sections 1 & 2
Philosophical Remarks on the Declaration of Independence: Sections 3, 4 & 5
Declaration of Independence, the deleted passage
American Political Philosophy - The Basics (a variety of related discussions)
Questions to consider:
What are the relationship among St. Thomas Aquinas's concepts (or are they simply accurate descriptions?) of Revealed Theology and Natural Theology and Natural Law?
What are the political and legal ramifications of considering human beings to be "God's Property" (via John Locke, by way of an exemplar of argumentation along these lines)?
What constitutes a "False Religion" in the Virginia Act of Religious Freedom, according to Jefferson?
Do "False Religions" under Jefferson's definitions have any claim to protections, exceptions, emoluments, privileges or even a place in American society, law, and culture?
Until we return to this topic, Highbrow posts will continue as usual, exploring the frontiers of ephemera, aesthetic discriminations, and the activity of dispelling Philosophical Credulousness through the clarification of grammar.
![]() |
| Aristotle studying in his youth |
§ 57-1. Act for religious freedom recited.
The General Assembly, on January 16, 1786, passed an act in the following words:
"Whereas, Almighty God hath created the mind free; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishment, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the Holy Author of our religion, who, being Lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, have established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time; that to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical, and even the forcing him to support this or that teacher of his own religious persuasion, is depriving him of the comfortable liberty of giving his contributions to the particular pastor whose morals he would make his pattern, and whose powers he feels most persuasive to righteousness, and is withdrawing from the ministry those temporary rewards which, proceeding from an approbation of their personal conduct, are an additional incitement to earnest and unremitting labors, for the instruction of mankind; that our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions any more than our opinions in physics or geometry; that therefore the proscribing any citizen as unworthy the public confidence by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to offices of trust and emolument, unless he profess or renounce this or that religious opinion, is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and advantages to which, in common with his fellow citizens, he has a natural right; that it tends only to corrupt the principles of that religion it is meant to encourage, by bribing, with a monopoly of worldly honors and emoluments, those who will externally profess and conform to it; that though, indeed, those are criminal who do not withstand such temptation, yet, neither are those innocent who lay the bait in their way; that to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion, and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency, is a dangerous fallacy, which at once destroys all religious liberty, because he, being of course judge of that tendency, will make his opinions the rules of judgment, and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they shall square with or differ from his own; that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere, when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail, if left to herself; that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate; errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them:
"Be it enacted by the General Assembly, That no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested or burthened, in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge or affect their civil capacities.
"And though we well know that this Assembly, elected by the people for the ordinary purposes of legislation only, have no power to restrain the acts of succeeding assemblies constituted with powers equal to our own, and that, therefore, to declare this act to be irrevocable would be of no effect in law; yet we are free to declare, and do declare, that the rights hereby asserted are of the natural rights of mankind; and that if any act shall be hereafter passed to repeal the present, or to narrow its operation, such act will be an infringement of natural right."
Source
More
More
Analysis forthcoming. Stay tuned.
Click the cover image (or HERE) for the Amazon sales page. Routledge description HERE.
None. It is adventure, high fantasy, satire, and an inquiry into the character and nature of the Human Condition.
Click the image to view the Amazon descriptions of the books:
Curious subject, curious ideas, curious sub-culture, curious--and very interesting--history... indeed a curious city
![]() |
| Richard M. Powers’ (1962) for Conditionally Human by Walter M. Miller Jr. |
© Copyright 2026 Richard Kostelanetz, reproduced by permission. Source: KostelOmnibus on Substack
![]() |
| Richard Kostelanetz by Leonid Drozner, |
"When Man faces doom from outer space, he must choose between escape to other worlds or life in giant cocoons."
Bob Fosse: "The Aloof", "The Heavyweight", "The Big Finish" from Sweet Charity:
Meet Bob Fosse:
Vito Paulekas: "Invocation and Ritual Dance Of The Young Pumpkin":
Meet Vito Paulekas:
(Kind thanks to Professor Hodges for allowing me to derive from his theoretical work on one-line poems the neologism "Zenoic Proverbialness.")
![]() |
| Preparing to Meet Zeno |
For some time now, Professor John Geraghty has been using AI to explore acrostics in Paradise Lost. Recently, he has been identifying acrostics in Chapman's translation of the Homeric Hymns:
Naivete
Afar off an orchid tower
Purple prose arranging
Mounting expectations
Distant, arising, a spectacle
Coaxing a young soul
Earnest and wild and breathing
Grasping a known unknown
Credulous colors coalescing
An adhering moment viewing the future
Persistent impression, fostering dreams
Paradise Lost has been translated into several African languages. Various editions are available in countries like Nigeria and South Africa. Online platforms provide access to digital copies across the continent. Literary festivals in Africa sometimes feature discussions on the work.
Southeast Asia nations altogether probably have many translations. What is unique about the upcoming presentation of Milton’s work in both art & literature is that art and interpretive versions in early 21st century productions are presented. This is our time to celebrate the greatest work in the English language by some of the greatest proponents of this work in our time.
Philippine art combines indigenous folk art, East-Asian and classical traditions. During the Spanish colonial period, art was used to spread Catholicism mainly through paintings and sculptures. Victorio Edades, known as the father of Modern Philippine Art, popularized Modernism in the Philippines in 1920s and 1930s.
Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr. was born in 7. 1962 in Davao City, Philippines, and attended the Learning Center of the Arts (now Ford Academy of the Arts) in Davao, where he studied Drawings and paintings from Professor Calota Abellana de Pio, and Professor Victorio Edades.
Banez’s work revolves around the theme of Paradise Lost,
the 666 Human Imperfection, the reign of spiritual darkness in the world, which
expresses itself through psychedelic depictions of evil human nature and
sub-human auras. The bible message in Matthew 4 :8 is the point of departure for his proposition. It is a proposition that stems from mythology
and faith into the strong belief in the Tower of Babel, Christendom and in the
Judeo-Christian metanarrative wherein the Devil's rebellion is an overarching
end prevailing in the mundane world. Bones using jewel-toned colors, and human
"evil" promulgating the idea of feelings that rise up in themselves
when we are faced by wars, experimental vaccines, racism and environmental degradation.
Between 2009 and 2014 several drawings and paintings of Banez were acquired for the Robert J. Wickenheiser John Milton collection at the University of South Carolina. In 2017 a portrait of John Milton was added to the Milton’s Cottage collection, and he was named to the editorial board of Emanations, a print anthology of poetry, fiction, essays and fine arts published by International Authors founded by Professor Carter Kaplan. In 2010 he was included in Lexikon Surreal and KunstHerz 2021 by Prof Gerhard Habarta.
The exhibit includes Terrance Lindall, as seen in Milton for Moderns:
https://issuu.com/lindall/docs/lindall_s_milton_for_moderns
-- Terrance Lindall