Answer: The Dada
Doubtful substance, yet compelling... Why? Can a film be compelling while remaining "uninteresting"? Can a film be "well-made", excite curiosity, effectively operate exotic imagery, garner praise from filmmakers, yet come across as empty? Can a film be excellent as film qua film, yet found lacking against the well-developed aesthetic criteria that have emerged from our understanding of good novels, moving poetry, insightful philosophical myth and uplifting philosophical understanding?
Grotesque, curious, edgy, provocative, tense... Could it be director Friedkin is provoking anthropological-psychological apprehensions about "What happens next?" Here do we find "true" human typologies? That is, could "hypnosis" be the defining approach to understanding Sorcerer? Not surprisingly sensationalism drives the spell.
In any event, there is ample material for critical analysis. An "excellent" subject for a paper, surely.
![]() |
| Arbeiterstadt ~ Working-Class City aka City of Workers by Hans Baluschek, 1920 Oil on Canvas 123 cm x 92,1 cm Milwaukee Art Museum |
The moon followed them until the sky grew light. Morning seemed to come rather quickly. Bronson noticed, however, that he had feelings neither one way or another about how soon morning came. He didn’t care when morning came—so long as he didn’t have to work that day.
- The Sky-Shaped Sarcophagus
His hour is one of darkness, and adversity, and peril. But should domestic tyranny oppress us, or the invader’s step pollute our soil, still may the Gray Champion come, for he is the type of New England’s hereditary spirit; and his shadowy march, on the eve of danger, must ever be the pledge that New England’s sons will vindicate their ancestry.
A recent discovery: Terrance advises me that he was unaware this piece had been published. He writes, "I don't remember getting paid for it. I guess I sold the paintings..."
What follows is my edit/ordering, with the panel text appearing below each of the paintings. The cover of the magazine appears at the end of the piece.
![]() |
| Of my dejected soul I have made this domain wherein I spend my days. / In the shadows of lonely places a heavy weight of hours has bowed and tamed me. |
![]() |
| Pursued by doubts I flee. The face of Earth has maddened me. |
I especially like the combination of pointillist textures and the forms suggesting Eves Tanguy, moreover expressing Terrance's characteristic "paleo-life form" surrealist creatures. Acknowledging Byron, Keats and Baudelaire is a nice touch, as it points readers away from the magazine and toward a critical-historical context that transcends the sensational and commercial factors that otherwise (and usually in this particular publication) constrain the possibilities for enriching the reader's understanding of emotions, emotional content, emotional correlatives... and taste. Terrance's paintings place fine art into the hands of a large audience, which can only be good.
In the latest St Christopher Club Newsletter, Club Secretary David Cursons gives Emanations 12 a mention. The book presents the first part of Michael Butterworth's St Christopher school memoir: Driven by Anger, Part I "The Little Arundalean".
Mr. Butterworth's piece is remarkably fluent and detailed, belying the extraordinary efforts he took reconstructing the past.
In Part Two, Mr. Butterworth will provide further accounts of his life at the school (to be published in Emanations 13, of course). In Part Three he will explore the philosophical background of the school, including its initial founding rooted in the educational concepts of the Theosophical Society--which I anticipate with much curiosity.
The St C Club Newsletter is not affiliated with the school.
Are mental properties properties of complex material systems?
Are mental properties complex material systems?
Is mentality--or are mental processes--complex material systems?
Is mentality material? A system? Is mentality mentality, as in mentality qua mentality? Or do we mean something else by "mentality"?
Could mentality be a concept? And, if so, what kind of a concept is it? And how is this concept employed?
How should--or how could--we explain "mentality" to a child? For the purposes of our investigation, let's say he or she is an intelligent child ten years old. If such an exercise proves rewarding, consider a series of children decreasing in age. At what points do our strategies for explaining mentality alter, and how so?
If the child was trans or identified as an animal, how would this alter our strategies for explanation?
Imagine a far away planet with a complex civilization, and the beings there do not possess mentality. Contrast this with a distant planet with a civilization whose member beings do possess mentality.
More in this vein? Click HERE for a note on methodology.
Corrected transliteration:
adalamŋinmenzen
udba menden
adalamŋinmenden
zae hemen