Friday, February 28, 2025

Specters of syntactic illusion and intellectual myth...

Max Ernst - Landscape with Wheat Sprouts , 1936



Does a consideration (discussion) of Noumena and Phenomena contribute to an appropriate response to this painting; say, for example, in description or criticism, or even, more broadly, in a discussion about aesthetics that uses this painting as a point of departure? Is a consideration of Noumena and Phenomena characteristic of an inappropriate response to this (or any) painting? Next, do these questions challenge the concept of Noumena and Phenomena, in particular the existence of a noumenal object, be it in space or space qua space? Finally, can a Noumenon, as such, even be an object, or is its efficacy necessarily relegated and limited to the status of a grammatical subject, as an abstraction, as a concept without an antecedent (compare a relative pronoun lacking an antecedent), as a figment of conceptual confusion, as a specter of syntactic illusion or intellectual myth, and so on?

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

Sensationalism, Sensational, Sensation

Model: Charles Henri Ford (1908-2002), for Vogue, 1937 Photographer: Cecil Beaton (1904-1980) Costume Design: Salvador Dalí (1904-1989)
Ed Valigursky

Oz Hardwick


Tuesday, February 25, 2025

"Wisdom Dots"

Here is a music video by Andrew Braunberger and Dana Bailey.  Some of the papers seen in the video are clippings from Mr. Braunberger's collage projects using Emanations 11.  As the video progresses, some of these collages become animated. These pieces, sans animation, are slated to appear in Emanations 12.

Saturday, February 22, 2025

Avant-Garde Davao 2025

 

Click HERE to read about the show.

Friday, February 21, 2025

Suggested Highbrow Readings in Theology and Political Philosophy - Please Share

My purpose in the following notes is two-fold. 

First, I seek to describe a thread in political philosophy that epitomizes traditional Skeptical and Liberal views of theology, human nature and  moral philosophy. The formulations presented here are Western in character but American in expression.  

Second, I seek to describe the American concept of the nation-state--an  institution whose success (or failure) is measured by the state's ability to deliver services and protections to its people. Among the securities that the nation-state provides are flexible moves against the utopian cult of world government and the corruptions and self-serving oligarchies that attended this cult.  That is, the nation-state protects people from "corporate social organization," an aggregate of tribalism, technocracy, scientism, statism, authoritarianism, group-think, shame culture, and so on. These tendencies represent a nexus of sociological and psychological phenomena driven by various weaknesses in human nature.  Education and family are the chief bulwarks of an effective defense.

Against the chance my thinking in these matters will be rejected by History (or, more immediately, by contemporary philosophers and school teachers), I offer the novels listed on the right of this page, where people will find literary amusements characterized by deep and refreshing moral themes, as well as a bit of humor.

Several months ago I made a slight-but-significant revision to the note titled "Sources for an American Idea of Revolution" where the reader will find, towards the end, a link leading to a dilation upon the theme of Milton and the uses of the "Synoptic Surview"--the literary exercise of Analytic Philosophy. The Synoptic Surview is a practice for the examination of grammar, epistemology, ethics and political philosophy. Herein lies the progression from Milton to Analytic Philosophy, as well as the path from Analytic Philosophy to Milton.  


Galileo Receiving Milton by Annibale Gatti (1827-1909)






If you find these subjects interesting, consider the International Authors edition of The Scarlet Letter with my Afterword: '"A' is for Antinomian: Theology and Politics in The Scarlet Letter."  Click HERE.

Thursday, February 20, 2025

Monday, February 17, 2025

Theological musings from Vladimir Nabokov's Pale Fire

Another colloquy between Shadian critic and editor Prof. Charles Kinbote and poet Prof. John Shade, here in the footnote to line 549:

Line 549: While snubbing gods including the big G

Here indeed is the Gist of the matter. And this, I think, not only the institute (see line 517) but our poet himself missed. For a Christian, no Beyond is acceptable or imaginable without the participation of God in our eternal destiny, and this in turn implies a condign punishment far every sin, great and small. My little diary happens to contain a few jottings referring to a conversation the poet and I had on June 23 “on my terrace after a game of chess, a draw.” I transcribe them here only because they cast a fascinating light on his attitude toward the subject.

 I had mentioned - I do not recall in what connection - certain differences between my Church and his. It should be noted that our Zemblan brand of Protestantism is rather closely related to the “higher” churches of the Anglican Communion, but has some magnificent peculiarities of its own. The Reformation with us had been headed by a composer of genius; our liturgy is penetrated with rich music; our boy choirs are the sweetest in the world. Sybil Shade came from a Catholic family but since early girlhood developed, as she told me herself, “a religion of her own” - which is generally synonymous, at the best, with a half-hearted attachment to some half-heathen sect or, at the worst, with tepid atheism. She had weaned her husband not only from the Episcopal Church of his fathers, but from all forms of sacramental worship.

We happened to start speaking of the general present-day nebulation of the notion of “sin,” of its confusion with the much more carnally colored ideal of “crime,” and I alluded briefly to my childhood contacts with certain rituals of our church. Confession with us is auricular and is conducted in a richly ornamented recess, the confessionist holding a lighted taper and standing with it beside the priest's highbacked seat which is shaped almost exactly as the coronation chair of a Scottish king. Little polite boy that I was, I always feared to stain his purple-black sleeve with the scalding tears of wax that kept dripping onto my knuckles, forming there tight little crusts, and I was fascinated by the illumed concavity of his ear resembling a seashell or a glossy orchid, a convoluted receptacle that seemed much too large for the disposal of my peccadilloes.

SHADE: All the seven deadly sins are peccadilloes but without three of them, Pride, Lust and Sloth, poetry might never have been born.

KINBOTE: Is it fair to base objections upon obsolete terminology?

SHADE: All religions are based upon obsolete terminology.

KINBOTE: What we term Original Sin can never grow obsolete.

SHADE: I know nothing about that. In fact when I was small I thought it meant Cain killing Abel. Personally, I am with the old snuff-takers: L'homme est né bon.

KINBOTE: Yet disobeying the Divine Will is a fundamental definition of Sin.

SHADE: I cannot disobey something which I do not know and the reality of which I have the right to deny.

KINBOTE: Tut-tut. Do you also deny that there are sins?

SHADE: I can name only two: murder, and the deliberate infliction of pain.

KINBOTE: Then a man spending his life in absolute solitude could not be a sinner?

SHADE: He could torture animals. He could poison the springs on his island. He could denounce an innocent man in a posthumous manifesto.

KINBOTE: And so the password is -?

SHADE: Pity.

KINBOTE: But who instilled it in us, John? Who is the Judge of life, and the Designer of death?

SHADE: Life is a great surprise. I do not see why death should not be an even greater one.

KINBOTE: Now I have caught you, John: once we deny a Higher Intelligence that plans and administrates our individual hereafters we are bound to accept the unspeakably dreadful notion of Chance reaching into eternity. Consider the situation, Throughout eternity our poor ghosts are exposed to nameless vicissitudes. There is no appeal, no advice, no support, no protection, nothing. Poor Kinbote's ghost, poor Shade's shade, may have blundered, may have taken the wrong turn somewhere - oh, from sheer absent-mindedness, or simply through ignorance of a trivial rule in the preposterous game of nature - if there be any rules.

SHADE: There are rules in chess problems: interdiction of dual solutions, for instance.

KINBOTE: I had in mind diabolical rules likely to be broken by the other party as soon as we come to understand them. That is why goetic magic does not always work. The demons in their prismatic malice betray the agreement between us and them, and we are again in the chaos of chance. Even if we temper Chance with Necessity and allow godless determinism, the mechanism of cause and effect, to provide our souls after death with the dubious solace of metastatistics, we still have to reckon with the individual mishap, the thousand and second highway accident of those scheduled for independence Day in Hades. No-no, if we want to be serious about the hereafter let us not begin by degrading it to the level of a science-fiction yarn or a spiritualistic case history. The ideal of one's soul plunging into limitless and chaotic afterlife with no Providence to direct her –

SHADE: There is always a psychopompos around the corner, isn't there?

KINBOTE: Not around that corner, John. With no Providence the soul must rely on the dust of its husk, on the experience gathered in the course of corporeal confinement, and cling childishly to small-town principles, local by-laws and a personality consisting mainly of the shadows of its own prison bars. Such an idea is not to be entertained one instant by the religious mind. How much more intelligent it is - even from a proud infidel's point of view! - to accept God's Presence - a faint phosphorescence at first, a pale light in the dimness of bodily life, and a dazzling radiance after it? I too, I too, my dear John, have been assailed in my time by religious doubts. The church helped me to fight them off. It also helped me not to ask too much, not to demand too clear an image of what is unimaginable. St. Augustine said –

SHADE: Why must one always quote St. Augustine to me?

KINBOTE: As St. Augustine said, “One can know what God is not; one cannot know what He is.” I think I know what He is not: He is not despair, He is not terror, He is not the earth in one's rattling throat, not the black hum in one's ears fading to nothing in nothing. I know also that the world could not have occurred fortuitously and that somehow Mind is involved as a main factor in the making of the universe. In trying to find the right name for that Universal Mind, or First Cause, or the Absolute, or Nature, I submit that the Name of God has priority.

To view the Amazon sales page for Pale Fire, click Nabokov's picture:




Saturday, February 15, 2025

DOGE analysis of USAID - an overview of multiple scenarios, concerns, and endorsements

I found this useful.  

 

I suspect Mr. Musk knows what he is doing, and the DOGE team is in close contact with other groups that have plans to continue the programs that are important/legitimate.

Now, the following is very speculative: I "cautiously" wonder if the mandate for these audits and transparencies might have emerged from discussions Mr. Musk's people have had with the "upper echelon" AI they have access to, and AI said, "If you human beings expect to be a spacefaring race, you need to clean up your act."  

Such ideas are perhaps best explored in the form of short stories and essays for Emanations, or maybe somebody could ask Mr. Musk.

It goes without saying but I'll say it anyway: proceed down this rabbit hole with caution.

Friday, February 14, 2025

Hermes as Psychopomp


 

 

 

Relief from a carved funerary lekythos at Athens: Hermes as psychopomp conducts the deceased, Myrrine, a priestess of Athena, to Hades, c.430–420 BC (National Archaeological Museum of Athens)