A tentative note:
A proposition is a statement that can be said to make a claim about reality or a state of affairs. Our examination of a proposition should seek to identify the proposition’s meaning, its sense (its meaning in context and/or in relation to something else), its verity (true or false?), it’s legitimacy (whether it is the case or is not the case) and the proposition’s appropriateness. Identifying the context in which a proposition is uttered is key to answering these questions and to coming to an understanding of the proposition.
For the nonce, let’s say
that there are four types of propositions: 1) Analytic, such as, “two
and two is four”; 2) internal, such as “I have a headache”; 3) External,
or Empirical, such as, “I hear a Cardinal in the trees” or “I see an
error in the data"; and 4) Categorical/Subjective, such as,
“stealing is wrong" or “the ‘Mona Lisa’ is a beautiful painting.”
I am wondering if there
is after all only one type of proposition that can either be true or false (or anyway that can be proven true or false with logic): Analytic.
The others are rather statements of a different order. Internal
propositions do not describe anything that can be logically proven: whether
they are true or false has little or no bearing upon our philosophical
understanding or a description of actual reality. Rather, such
statements guide (or do not guide) our behavior and our utterances. External
propositions can be no more than descriptive. If descriptive statements are
false then they are simply nonsense, and thus are not propositions; that is,
they don't inform us about anything, except perhaps that a person who vocalizes
them is stupid, lacking a reliable or reasonable sensibility, or is lying. Categorical
(aesthetic, moral, political) propositions—or rather the expressions of
moral, aesthetic, or political views—are neither true nor false, they are
simply statements about belief or conviction. The question is, are they persuasive
or do people agree?
This is not the final
word, but a sketch. When it comes to this subject, I very much
doubt there can be a final word.
I plan to revise and
elaborate this in future. Stay tuned for more.
Daniel Huntington, "Philosophy and Christian Art" (1868) |
No comments:
Post a Comment