tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5543141244177287208.post6575080441838510601..comments2024-01-26T20:44:51.703-05:00Comments on Highbrow: The Tao of the TractatusCarter Kaplanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12238488445515604870noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5543141244177287208.post-50029805150533945782009-08-24T09:25:54.018-04:002009-08-24T09:25:54.018-04:00Why thank you, Carter.
& thanks for the addit...Why thank you, Carter.<br /><br />& thanks for the additional reading suggestion.Timeshadowshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09952601433965644275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5543141244177287208.post-12718115604905278332009-08-22T14:11:41.574-04:002009-08-22T14:11:41.574-04:00Very droll, Timeshadows.
Of course the first post...Very droll, Timeshadows.<br /><br />Of course the first post is chiefly concerned with W's later phase, while this more recent post concerns the early phase. Both phases, however, are predicated upon his revolutionary concept of philosophy, which isn't at all revolutionary if you consider Locke, who basically viewed philosophy the same way, and who was a _real_ revolutionary, incidentally. For further reading, in this thread, I suggest Matthew Stewart's treatment of Wittgenstein in his _Truth About Everything_ in which Wittgenstein is described as "The Catcher in the Philosophy Department."Carter Kaplanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12238488445515604870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5543141244177287208.post-75113804419709876142009-08-22T04:16:42.146-04:002009-08-22T04:16:42.146-04:00Okay, if that is the summation of your previous po...Okay, if that is the summation of your previous post (which seemed to go in a very different direction), then yes, we agree.<br />--Not that that means a fig. ;)Timeshadowshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09952601433965644275noreply@blogger.com